🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an celebration that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are remunerated to talk to white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade created a surge in the industry of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in February, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and civil rights battles, and increasingly on influential individuals of color in politics, culture, and activism, and extensively acknowledging the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the political moment. How it progresses is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the summer we witnessed the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. a prominent political figure, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a cause for alarm. At the same time, extreme conservative groups are surging in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the US, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been carried, frequently with success, to the top legal institutions of the state. A campaign to erase African American heritage and experience from the records is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month represents how insufficiently it can be effective if it is limited to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the conditions of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is detached from the broader ongoing work that is needed. Denise Miller, a educator at University of Greenwich, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of racial movements – community-based BLM initiatives, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an foundation that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not evade political issues, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves simple recognition of the past when it ignores the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who mark it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of implicit prejudice and sensitivity to minor insults, but confronted with the threats that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. Perhaps an entire name rebrand is in order – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.